> They can be disbarred. Your AI can't. Why not? That seems to be lacking imagination. There's all sorts of regulation that can be brought to bear. > Yeah, be

> They can be disbarred. Your AI can't. Why not? That seems to be lacking imagination. There's all sorts of regulation that can be brought to bear. > Yeah, because ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all. You can think so, but others disagree. Here is where the thread started. > The more I work with LLMs, the more I think of them as plagiarization engines. > We're all kind of plagiariztion engines. If you don't see any similarities others see, then further discussion is fruitless. > ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all. Chat is a behavior humans do. It chats, and pretty damn well. Clearly you mean something else then what you are explicitly saying.