4 ms·
There's a long list of things that I think are abused in an effort to save on some vaguely defined future cost that never seems to materialize. Some things off
by jvans 4y ago
There's a long list of things that I think are abused in an effort to save on some vaguely defined future cost that never seems to materialize. Some things off the top of my head:
* Interfaces(particularly in java) that have 1 implementation.
* Interfaces with many implementations but where each implementation is used in exactly 1 place.
* large inheritance hierarchies with generic type parameters. I'm sure there's a good use case for this but
it's usually a pain.
* Writing "generic" code in an effort to make something re-usable when in reality the code has knowledge of every location it is used in and tightly couples all implementations
- cwilkes 4y agoI actually like the “one interface with one implementation” as it makes for less surprises. With an interface I know that only that method can be called. If a class is passed in i have no idea what methods going to be used. It also gives me a better feeling that the coder has in mind what they need a parameter to do without worrying that they are going to rely on a couple of othogonal methods to be called.