3 ms·
Your idea is the gold standard in explaining the influence of training data. People may be interested in this paper and more modern variations: https://arxiv.or
by version_five 4y ago
Your idea is the gold standard in explaining the influence of training data. People may be interested in this paper and more modern variations: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04730 https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04730
It attempts to do as you suggest in a tractable way, to understand which training data is most influential.
- whatshisface 4y agoHas the output of this tool been measured against the gold standard so that we can tell whether or not it is working?
- version_five 4y agoNo, this tool (Stable Attribution) doesn't actually do training sample attribution. See my other comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34670483 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34670483