4 ms·
I recommend the assembly3 addon, written by one of the developers responsible for solving the hierarchical naming issue. the core of FreeCAD is capable of assem
by khimaros 4y ago
I recommend the assembly3 addon, written by one of the developers responsible for solving the hierarchical naming issue. the core of FreeCAD is capable of assembly based workflows, it just isn't a built-in feature/workbench yet.
- mkl 4y agoHow does that compare to Assembly 4 or A2Plus? I've just started trying to use FreeCAD for woodworking projects, and currently find the designing of separate parts and connecting them to be very difficult to understand.
- 2muchcoffeeman 4y agoI use Assembly 4 because I frankly couldn’t understand how A3 worked. A4 is much more straightforward. Create LCSes. Align LCSes.
- khimaros 4y agoa2plus is the most user friendly of the three. assembly4 has no direct lineage to assembly3 (confusingly). A4 uses local coordinate systems to place parts where A3 uses a constraint solver. there is a good overview here: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/Assembly https://wiki.freecadweb.org/Assembly