2 ms·
If they don't then is that evidence that AGI is NBD? To be clear: I don't think this is a good line of thinking from the beginning, so I'm not surprised when t
by willis936 4y ago
If they don't then is that evidence that AGI is NBD?
To be clear: I don't think this is a good line of thinking from the beginning, so I'm not surprised when the conclusions are not useful.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mach1ne 4y agoThe point isn’t to derive useful conclusions. The fact that we have no idea about the probability of the existence of extraterrestial intelligence seems to make it inherently impossible to derive any conclusions from a formula where they play a vital part.
- gfodor 4y agoCorrect - it never ceases to amaze me the degree of certainty of many of the so called “skeptics” when it comes to questions for which we have no way to really generate meaningful priors on.