6 ms·
> This paper shows the tic tac video exhibited instantaneous acceleration to over 20,000 mph Would't it mean that the footage doesn't actually show real object
by mrtksn 4y ago
> This paper shows the tic tac video exhibited instantaneous acceleration to over 20,000 mph
Would't it mean that the footage doesn't actually show real objects then?
You see a Mona Lisa on the wall in your friends house, before you assume that your friend has the original or that Leonardo Da Vinci painted two of those and this is the other one you will need to go through many many other scenarios because you know a thing or two about the painting and your friend. You don't just throw away all your constructs about the world on the first observed anomaly.
- likeabbas 4y agoNobody is throwing away all of the constructs of what we know. This may turn out to be sensor malfunction. But the DoD has over 300 events of unidentified objects that exhibit interesting flight characteristics. At the very least we should not be ignoring this data, but studying it deeply to figure out what it is. Either it’s a foreign adversary with advanced technology, an adversary that is spoofing our sensor systems, or it’s something else. Whatever it is, We need to find out
- mrtksn 4y agoOf course it's interesting and worth investigating but there is underlining suggestion, dog whistle if you wish, that these are records of extraterrestrial activity or physics beyond our understanding. It's a new age mysticism.
- j0057 4y agoThere are plenty of explanations for these videos that don't involve alien species traveling multiple light years to troll American air force pilots, like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGzJ9dx3n4o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGzJ9dx3n4o.
- likeabbas 4y agoyoutubers can hand waive off a few grainy videos. You can’t waive off corroborating classified data from radar, sonar, satellites, and military pilot testimony.
- sambull 4y agoEven one that the Navy itself patented.. https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en
- j0057 4y agoSure, why not, what are we looking at though, some kind of microwave propulsion for spacecraft? Was a prototype ever built?
- likeabbas 4y agoThe author, Salvatore Pais, has been on a few podcasts saying so
- sambull 4y agoThe patent Summary, "The present invention is directed to a craft using an inertial mass reduction device. The craft includes an inner resonant cavity wall, an outer resonant cavity, and microwave emitters. The outer resonant cavity wall and the inner resonant cavity wall form a resonant cavity. The microwave emitters create high frequency electromagnetic waves throughout the resonant cavity causing the outer resonant cavity wall to vibrate in an accelerated mode and create a local polarized vacuum outside the outer resonant cavity wall. It is a feature of the present invention to provide a craft, using an inertial mass reduction device, that can travel at extreme speeds."
- j0057 4y agoI read that too, that's why I asked. Here is an article about it: https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2021/02/08/what-is-behind-the-us-navys-ufo-fusion-energy-patent/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2021/02/08/what-is-b... — this thing is supposed to enable faster than light travel, which needless to say is impossible according to our best understanding of the laws of physics. I suppose that is part as well of the great PSYOP for suppressing the truth.
- 4y ago
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 4y agoHonestly the "it's aliens" explanation is so unlikely that I'd put "Wakanda is real" above it in my probability tables.
- likeabbas 4y agoCryptoterrestrial is another hypothesis floated by some in the intelligence community
- stevenhuang 4y agoYou can update your priors by looking into more cases. A pattern emerges. See UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record by Leslie Kean.
- likeabbas 4y agoI just want to say thanks for your inputs in this thread.
- stevenhuang 4y agoHey thanks, yours as well! This topic is a lot deeper than many realize, luckily the shift in perception is occurring and we're starting to take this seriously.
- hanszarkov 4y agoThat book by Leslie Keane is honest journalism, a fair treatment, I liked it.
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoDo you have any reason to suppose that we are ignoring it? Any reason to suppose that we are not studying it deeply?
- likeabbas 4y agoYes. The Chinese blimp being a huge news story, but the 300 unidentified objects over US airspace (some with performance characteristics that we cannot explain) is the biggest reason. Some in the government are studying this for sure, but it's not getting the attention that it needs.
- Zetobal 4y agoHow much attention would be right and how do you know it's not applied? It's all just rambling on your part if you were really concerned you wouldn't be concerned on the internet you would be one of those people looking at it...
- narag 4y ago> This paper shows the tic tac video exhibited instantaneous acceleration to over 20,000 mph Would't it mean that the footage doesn't actually show real objects then? Maybe, but consider the context: even if the acceleration was more "reasonable", wouldn't you feel something's missing? I mean any indication of a propulsion system, like reaction gases or propellers. My point is: if we're watching something we have no idea how it works, it doesn't make sense to tell it how it should behave. How could one vehicle move if not using jets, rockets or other known means? Maybe creating some kind of field? A field gives accelereation instantly and uniformly. So if you can manipulate a field, everything inside it will accelerate as fast as you can gauge it and without feeling G forces. That thing could even have a crew.
- giantrobot 4y agoSure it could be a "field" that might as well be described as magic. But where's the craft's interaction with the atmosphere? Normally an object traveling thousands of miles an hour hits a fair amount of atmosphere. An object traveling fast enough actually turns atmospheric gases into a plasma. Plasma is not only hot but will reflect radio waves. Now you need to invent a second magic technology that explains the lack of plasma trails following the path of this supposedly hypersonic object.
- WarChortle 4y ago"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" Arthur C. Clarke To preface this, I agree with you, per our current scientific understanding, this isn't possible. That being said, we would be fools to look at our level of technology and think we could grasp everything in the universe. I'm not saying what we saw in the video is real. I just think dismissing something because it doesn't fit our understanding of reality in the current moment, is not in our best interest. Take almost any piece of advanced tech we use everyday back in time far enough, you will get a similar response. Maybe seeing an object doing this in real life gives enough information to work backwards and realize we made some mistakes. When we adjust our understanding it not only seems possible but helps explain other things we couldn't before. Maybe some other country is fucking with us, somehow, advanced hologram tech or something. Who knows, I think being skeptical, but approaching it with an open mind is the best way to go about it.