3 ms·
> That's only because you understand the algorithm in the first example. I can start with van Gogh's Starry Night, get the prompt "starry night, van Gogh" and
by oldgradstudent 4y ago
> That's only because you understand the algorithm in the first example.
I can start with van Gogh's Starry Night, get the prompt "starry night, van Gogh" and get Starry Night back.
I'm using Starry Night as an example because Stable Diffusion consistently reproduces it, sometimes with the original frame, even with vaguely related prompts.
I'd say the jury will be making the right decision. Especially if the original image was part of the training set.
- williamcotton 4y agoWhat you’re missing is that the Stable Diffusion defense will roll out example after example of non-infringing cases, like inpainting to remove power lines from a vacation photo. They will be trying to establish significant non-infringing commercial use in order to establish that the tool is not specifically designed to get around copyright. A tool that specifically advertises itself at getting around copyright is going to have a very hard time in court…