4 ms·

Are you serious?!! All of these countries I listed had democratic governments couped out or attempted to be forced out by USA. If you are ignorant about history

Are you serious?!! All of these countries I listed had democratic governments couped out or attempted to be forced out by USA. If you are ignorant about history you can just Google it. Or maybe staying ignorant is part of your grand strategy to avoid cognitive dissonance. How is USA imposing a dictatorship on Chile nonsense? .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat#:~:text=On%2011%20September%201973%2C%20after,power%20in%20a%20coup%20of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27%C3%A9ta... https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-the-us-has-overthrown https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries...

riku_iki 4y ago
> How is USA imposing a dictatorship on Chile nonsense? I read section about US involvement, and nothing there says they organized coup in 1973, in opposite, this link says that many sources confirm US were not involved into the coup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_Chile#1973_coup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_... > Are you serious?!! My critics is directed to your propaganda-troll alike communication style: thrown 10 names of countries without any specifics.
- foverzar 4y ago
  > I read section about US involvement, and nothing there says they organized coup in 1973, in opposite, this link says that many sources confirm US were not involved into the coup Out of curiosity, skimmed the article a bit and look: > They [Kissinger and Nixon] do take credit for creating the conditions that led to the coup. Kissinger says that "they created the conditions as great as possible." Nixon and Kissinger also discussed how they would play this event with the media and lamented the fact that, if this were the era of Eisenhower, then they would be seen as heroes. Are you playing dumb or what? > My critics is directed to your propaganda-troll alike communication style: thrown 10 names of countries without any specifics. Seeing a spec in somebody's eye, but not noticing a log that's in your own, eh? Don't forget your tinfoil hat.
  - riku_iki 4y ago
    > Are you playing dumb or what? creating condition: economic sanctions, is not the same as be involved in the coup.
    - foverzar 4y ago
      Yeah, pushing someone of a cliff is definitely not the same as smashing their head with a rock.
      - riku_iki 4y ago
        Kommies completely restricted western trade. It was rules of engagement at that time, and US actions were soft comparing to kommies.
        foverzar 4y ago
        Sure, I guess sanctions were there just for the kicks without any real substantial effect. Just so that poor non-commies don't feel bad about themselves, since, you know, evil commies had already supposedly restricted all the trade. /s This has nothing do with "rules of engagement" and everything to do with the fact that the US had dominated global economy as a result of WWII and since then had been doing everything in its power to eliminate any possible opposition, competing, or really anyone who doesn't bow to Pax Americana.
        riku_iki 4y ago
        > the US had dominated global economy as a result of WWII or it is just capitalism is much more efficient than communism, or whatever bloody kommies tried to built.

riku_iki 4y ago

> How is USA imposing a dictatorship on Chile nonsense? I read section about US involvement, and nothing there says they organized coup in 1973, in opposite, this link says that many sources confirm US were not involved into the coup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_Chile#1973_coup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intervention_in_... > Are you serious?!! My critics is directed to your propaganda-troll alike communication style: thrown 10 names of countries without any specifics.

foverzar 4y ago
> I read section about US involvement, and nothing there says they organized coup in 1973, in opposite, this link says that many sources confirm US were not involved into the coup Out of curiosity, skimmed the article a bit and look: > They [Kissinger and Nixon] do take credit for creating the conditions that led to the coup. Kissinger says that "they created the conditions as great as possible." Nixon and Kissinger also discussed how they would play this event with the media and lamented the fact that, if this were the era of Eisenhower, then they would be seen as heroes. Are you playing dumb or what? > My critics is directed to your propaganda-troll alike communication style: thrown 10 names of countries without any specifics. Seeing a spec in somebody's eye, but not noticing a log that's in your own, eh? Don't forget your tinfoil hat.
- riku_iki 4y ago
  > Are you playing dumb or what? creating condition: economic sanctions, is not the same as be involved in the coup.
  - foverzar 4y ago
    Yeah, pushing someone of a cliff is definitely not the same as smashing their head with a rock.
    - riku_iki 4y ago
      Kommies completely restricted western trade. It was rules of engagement at that time, and US actions were soft comparing to kommies.
      - foverzar 4y ago
        Sure, I guess sanctions were there just for the kicks without any real substantial effect. Just so that poor non-commies don't feel bad about themselves, since, you know, evil commies had already supposedly restricted all the trade. /s This has nothing do with "rules of engagement" and everything to do with the fact that the US had dominated global economy as a result of WWII and since then had been doing everything in its power to eliminate any possible opposition, competing, or really anyone who doesn't bow to Pax Americana.
        riku_iki 4y ago
        > the US had dominated global economy as a result of WWII or it is just capitalism is much more efficient than communism, or whatever bloody kommies tried to built.