The problem is in taking down the balloon. It’s notionally operating in such a way that it’s ambiguous as to its intent. If it quacks like a high altitude scien

The problem is in taking down the balloon. It’s notionally operating in such a way that it’s ambiguous as to its intent. If it quacks like a high altitude science balloon, it could either be a high altitude scientific balloon or a military surveillance platform designed to imitate a high altitude surveillance balloon… The US defence establishment and executive branch are likely currently evaluating in deep detail every facet of this, and the entire history of this going back to Cold War era stuff like the program of balloons that lead to the whole Roswell incident… military balloons looking like science balloons is firmly in the “we did it before! How much of a leg to stand on do we have?” I expect they will tolerate it, and amplify a few teams by a person or two, in order to know ahead of time where these will be and to treat them as they do existing satellites that spy from higher up. They avoid many sensitive operations when surveillance is overhead as part of routine operational security best practices… to the point where they occasionally “make mistakes” in effort to sow false flags. TLDR… it’s just a new surveillance platform and there’s existing precedent for how to deal with this kind of threat, by the military… the politicians will just do the usual shit show attention seeking nonsense they always do.