3 ms·
I’d put it somewhat differently. I think you can have an adequate interpretation of quality for say the closest 100 colleagues if you have enough interactions.
by wjnc 4y ago
I’d put it somewhat differently. I think you can have an adequate interpretation of quality for say the closest 100 colleagues if you have enough interactions. However, the skills you’ll be basing your judgement on will be different for different groups And will probably not be the same skills as their manager would be scoring them on. Communication skills will tend to dominate harder skills if the organizational distance increases. I don’t think that’s false per se, I do think that there is a risk views get unbalanced.
- swagasaurus-rex 4y agoSome managers are so focused on micromanagement, they literally can’t tell who the top performers who work for them are. All they see is the attitudes, number of check ins, clock in times, and completely ignore the results