4 ms·
Seemingly that low mostly because of [testing] (66.2%) and [community-testing] (62.2%), [core] is 96.2% reproducible, only 10 packages left! Seems to be the mos
by capableweb 4y ago
Seemingly that low mostly because of [testing] (66.2%) and [community-testing] (62.2%), [core] is 96.2% reproducible, only 10 packages left! Seems to be the most difficult ones though:
> bash 5.1.016-3, glibc 2.36-7, linux 6.1.9.arch1-1, linux-docs 6.1.9.arch1-1, linux-headers 6.1.9.arch1-1, linux-lts 5.15.91-1, linux-lts-docs 5.15.91-1, linux-lts-headers 5.15.91-1, python 3.10.9-1, python-tests
From https://reproducible.archlinux.org/ https://reproducible.archlinux.org/
- voakbasda 4y agoI thought Debian had solved these issues for these packages? I wonder why Arch has not picked up that work and carried themselves across the finish line.
- capableweb 4y agoComparing https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/archlinux/archlinux.ht... with https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.ht..., it seems Debian is further away from being 100% reproducible than Arch.
- diffeomorphism 4y agoThe opposite? 96% for debian bookworm seems much larger than 91% for arch. And that percentage for arch is only for 186 packages in core, but 32795 for debian.