3 ms·
My comment had in mind a paper version, the one shown on the left-hand side of image[0]. I can't comment on the quality of its translation, but AFAICT the ideas
by euroderf 4y ago
My comment had in mind a paper version, the one shown on the left-hand side of image[0]. I can't comment on the quality of its translation, but AFAICT the ideas came thru very clearly. Yes, I am sure this book is VERY difficult to translate accurately.
[0]http://www.aldgatepress.co.uk/theweb/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/revolution4_w_gallery.jpg http://www.aldgatepress.co.uk/theweb/wp-content/uploads/2017...
- gverrilla 4y agoI see! But I'm now curious: if you are willing to take the effort, it would be nice if you could verify your paper version vs the 2 passages I specified. I'm asking this because I have a paper one in portuguese which has an EXCELLENT translation (I often checked the original while reading it), but if I search the public internet for pdf's all that is available is a very very very bad translation full of mistakes - which is sad. Would be interesting if we could verify the same thing for the english version! Good Sunday!
- euroderf 4y agoHmm, it's probably in storage. Can try.