> seem to do a phenomenal job of identifying root causes to avoid future incidents. When you see the regular incidents that do not result in crash, that statem

> seem to do a phenomenal job of identifying root causes to avoid future incidents. When you see the regular incidents that do not result in crash, that statement would be obviously regarded as false. Yes, things are mostly reliable because most of the time there are at least several safety features or processes in the way, but most crashes and incidents are still due to human error.