3 ms·
Google never released a state of the art model, what they run in translate, ranking, etc are efficient models on par with state of the art a few years ago. They
by visarga 4y ago
Google never released a state of the art model, what they run in translate, ranking, etc are efficient models on par with state of the art a few years ago. They train huge models that are too large to even demo (PaLM 540B) and never release the models, not even for academia to try to build on them. Their voices and OCR are behind competition, I'd rather use ElevenLabs and Amazon Textract.
Google makes a lot of noise but delivers little, and what they deliver is almost never the best in the world. I think maybe they made a mistake with TPUs and the PyTorch-NVIDIA path seems to be more productive and can deploy more advanced LLMs.
There was a time when I was dying for an invite to Gmail or Google Wave, but that time has long passed and nothing in-between caused that level of excitement. What I appreciate most from Google is YouTube, and not for the UI or recommendations but for simply being the largest video platform with everything you could want in music and education. If I lost access to YouTube internet would be dead for me, well, almost dead.
- hackernewds 4y agoGoogle does produce world-class products that are virtually free (and wouldn't be through competitors). They say, the best products run so well you barely even notice their competitors or their complexity. Google Maps comes to mind.
- astrange 4y agoGoogle Maps has actually gotten worse over time, and not even in the same way Search has where spam has been winning. eg in Japan they used to license the very best map data, but switched to the 2nd-best and cheaper one also used by Apple, and do a worse job presenting it. And of course globally its color scheme and visual hierarchy are stuck in 2005.