There's so many promises with the idea of containers that simply are not filled and when they are it's the same complexity and caveats of a DIY solution. It lo

There's so many promises with the idea of containers that simply are not filled and when they are it's the same complexity and caveats of a DIY solution. It looks tidier, it's presented with the word "docker" everywhere but you're solving the same problems in almost identical ways. Take reverts; you need commits with tags, volumes with backups, etc. Am I talking about doing it with or without docker there? Well, Both! This is what you keep discovering - you're doing the same thing in a new way; it's a presentation technology, not a simplification or task reduction one.