3 ms·
This is what everyone is saying, Sussman and MIT included... But it is not true. It is just how Windows is stitched together + no sources. And now systemd in Li
by Woodi 4y ago
This is what everyone is saying, Sussman and MIT included... But it is not true. It is just how Windows is stitched together + no sources. And now systemd in Linux - it was just first big application of cgroups and noone else was doing serious work with them. RedHat was realy leading force.
Everything is build from pieces and pieces are explainable. Ocasionally you have
hard algo but still you can understood what it do becouse it do exactly what simpler algo for that problem do.
Btw. there is not so much material in SICP - some tricks like lazy functions implementation and symbolic math. From that point of view it's good introductory course to compilers building :)