3 ms·
Actual white nationalism on HN is a fun treat. This is the dude you're affirmatively quoting, though I suspect you know that. https://gab.com/thuletide/posts/
by mikeyouse 4y ago
Actual white nationalism on HN is a fun treat. This is the dude you're affirmatively quoting, though I suspect you know that.
https://gab.com/thuletide/posts/106756852117838315 https://gab.com/thuletide/posts/106756852117838315
> There are basically four issues that actually matter in modern politics:
> 1. The worldwide genocide of Whites
> 2. The destruction of the family
> 3. The destruction of Christianity
> 4. The rapidly encroaching totalitarian, China/USSR-style technocracy
Read the replies for some fun insight into the type of people who agree with you both!
- nhchris 4y agoAgain as usual, the evidence presented is avoided in favor of ad hominem. You are counting on readers turning off their brain and ignoring it, once they learn the messenger is a bad person, aren't you?
- defrost 4y agoHighly selective quoting by thuletide of relatively few fringe opinions isn't evidence of a serious widespread plan to exterminate the "white race".
- nhchris 4y agoI only argued it is evidence that the charge of "stochastic terrorism" is applied very selectively. And the evidence isn't "opinion" - it gives examples of mainstream publications and professors that you can verify yourself.
- mikeyouse 4y agoNah, most people know how seriously to take the incoherent ramblings of dimwitted white nationalists without any outside help. And I'm less than surprised your post history is filled with scientific racism and complaints that ChatGPT doesn't properly discuss the number of Jewish people on Wall St. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34425317 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34425317
- nhchris 4y agoYet ChatGPT eagerly discusses the number of white people on Wall St. Funny how you omitted that, when the disparate treatment was the point, not any one example in isolation. When the truth isn't on your side, all you're left with is mudslinging and misdirection.
- aww_dang 4y agoSome will discuss anything but the topic at hand. It is telling that they need to review your post history instead of engaging with the topic.
- aww_dang 4y agoEither way it derailed the entire discussion.