4 ms·
> No less than voting when not everyone votes. ? it absolutely is less so. roughly 1/2 of eligible citizens vote; the proportion that call their reps is 1/2 of
by colinsane 4y ago
> No less than voting when not everyone votes.
? it absolutely is less so. roughly 1/2 of eligible citizens vote; the proportion that call their reps is 1/2 of 1/2 of 1/2 of […]. however you chop it, it’s significantly less.
i can’t but read you as saying that any system that fails to achieve 100% representation is equally flawed: that a system where only 1 person votes is “no less [egalitarian]” than a system where all-but-1 vote. you can’t honestly believe that.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> proportion that call their reps is 1/2 of 1/2 of 1/2 of… Some places have a culture of civic service. Many do not. I’ve canvassed for New York City elections with single-digit turnout; the last primary barely scratched double digits [1]. Would you castigate those who exercised their right to vote? Of course not. More pointedly: democracy doesn’t work with disengaged citizens. This is true for pure democracies; moreso for republics. Shame for civic participation is the opposite of responsible citizenship. If there are folks who lack access, help them. It takes a perverted reading of the history of democracy, of its formation and failures, to conclude engaging one’s representatives is anything but good. [1] https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/8/24/23320921/turnout-new-york-primary-low-voting-rights?_amp=true https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/8/24/23320921/turnout-new-york-...