Perhaps there could be a standard of "general intelligence" that doesn't require it to be right all the time, but merely have the ability to reason based on its

Perhaps there could be a standard of "general intelligence" that doesn't require it to be right all the time, but merely have the ability to reason based on its training data and conversation in plausible ways? Currently, when it fails, it does so in a way that people don't. How long might it take large AI models to reach this different standard of general intelligence, requiring them to fail in plausible ways rather than completely showing a lack of reasoning and understanding?