3 ms·
It feels especially silly when it has modern 240 MHz ESP32 instead on-board, as if it is somehow more authentic than a FPGA.
by zokier 4y ago
It feels especially silly when it has modern 240 MHz ESP32 instead on-board, as if it is somehow more authentic than a FPGA.
- musicale 4y agoPresumably you could do a cycle-accurate EZ80 implementation on the ESP32 as well. If the cycle timing and user-facing I/O pins are the same, the main differences resulting from implementation would presumably be in areas like form factor and power dissipation. I'm sure I've seen ESP32-based emulators running CP/M (or DOS for that matter) discussed on HN and elsewhere.