3 ms·
Followed the link thinking I would get a refresher on Nyquist frequency - but they meant another type of sampling. But if like me you were seeking a refresher h
by bigmattystyles 4y ago
Followed the link thinking I would get a refresher on Nyquist frequency - but they meant another type of sampling. But if like me you were seeking a refresher https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency
- karmakaze 4y agoI thought so too, though I'm quite interested in both types. At one time long ago I thought we can't just rasterize everything, there must be cases where, or as resolutions increase, it won't scale well/make sense. That didn't turn out to be the case. Another story was at one company I was at, they were trying to make raster-driven PCB masks (I think that was how it worked, I was in a different dept). The traces must be continuous and robust so is normally done pen-plotter style. They were able to keep increasing the resolution of the laser rasterizing process to the point where it no longer mattered. I think now the default view is to work in pixels, voxels, etc. For all we know, the universe could work that way too. Like what's with dark energy? Space being created by a vacuum.