4 ms·
I don't mean to be rude, but how is this the top voted comment? Extradition exists for a reason, and this comment lacks a serious depth of thinking and belongs
by jcampbell1 15y ago
I don't mean to be rude, but how is this the top voted comment? Extradition exists for a reason, and this comment lacks a serious depth of thinking and belongs on reddit.
Start here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition
Form arguments based on the restrictions outlined.
- chc 15y agoHis argument is based around jurisdiction, which is one of the restrictions outlined.
- jcampbell1 15y agoAssume for a moment, that he had stolen money from American Paypal accounts through phishing. Does the argument still make sense? I think is does not. The argument is visceral, nothing more. She makes a straw man argument about '.com' and '.net' that is completely irrelevant, but attracts the pitchforks and fools. How does the original comment have anything to do with jurisdiction?
- cynicalkane 15y agoI think part of the grandparent posters's complaint is that nirvana's claim seems more like wishful thinking on what nirvana wants the law to be, rather than how it works in practice. The comments below discuss the issues surrounding this extradition, while the top comment is relatively content-free. I'm guessing about this, of course, but if that's what motivated his post I'm inclined to agree.