4 ms·
FTR the evolutionary delay hypothesis used to be popular, but for the carboniferous, the most carbon-deposing period on earth, that theory has been dismissed. S
by est31 4y ago
FTR the evolutionary delay hypothesis used to be popular, but for the carboniferous, the most carbon-deposing period on earth, that theory has been dismissed. See this paper: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517943113 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517943113
TLDR:
* there is evidence for partial lignin breakdown in existing deposits, so we know it was a thing back then
* if it were just lignin breakdown, then we'd see orders of magnitude more deposits. that is, if you look at the per year deposit rate, you'll see only a small fraction of lignin being deposited.
* a large fraction of deposits doesn't even contain lignin, often below or above deposits with lignin, but without there being a different rate of depositions between them.
- xhkkffbf 4y agoThat has to make sense. Were there huge piles of dead plants just piling up everywhere? Was it vines all the way to the stratosphere?
- liquid_bluing 4y agoWas just going to post this. What a great community!
- fnordpiglet 4y agoWas about to google this up. Thanks