3 ms·
No, you completely miss the point. It's like complaining that a musician cannot practice their instrument without software that requires you to be always-onlin
by shzhdbi09gv8ioi 4y ago
No, you completely miss the point.
It's like complaining that a musician cannot practice their instrument without software that requires you to be always-online.
> Even if it was open source no user would be able to run it locally anyway.
You are just stating this, it does not make it true. Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally.
- jw1224 4y ago> Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally. Unless you work for OpenAI (and your “local” machine somehow has 1TB+ of VRAM, equivalent to roughly 25 A100s), this cannot possibly be true…
- bdhcuidbebe 4y ago1.7k forks… https://github.com/openai/gpt-3 https://github.com/openai/gpt-3 apart from that, several pre trained corpuses had been around for a while
- jw1224 4y agoThat repo just seems to be a bunch of JSON files and sample outputs. Am I missing something?
- Kiro 4y agoVery strange counterpoint that makes no sense unless you're just arguing against cloud software in general, which was clearly not the point the parent made. > Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally. Several people out of 8 billion is the same as no-one. The point made was that anyone should be able to run this document assistant on their local machine.
- Eater_of_food 4y ago> Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally. Do you mind sharing how? I didn't think the model was available to download and thought it was api only?