2 ms·
It's not rational at all. It shows a complete distrust for the employee. National security is different because the rules are imposed from the outside. These
by jedberg 4y ago
It's not rational at all. It shows a complete distrust for the employee.
National security is different because the rules are imposed from the outside. These are self imposed rules.
Also most defense contractor employees don't work that much overtime and many can take the non-classified parts of their work home.
- jiggawatts 4y agoLet me get this straight... you turned down a nearly seven-figure income because you would be required to not work at home and you were asked to stick to the same office hours as cubible farm workers making a tenth of that income? Umm... wat!?
- Retric 4y agoIncome has logarithmic value. His options were to make 350k and be happy day to day or make twice that and be in an activity hostile environment. Lifestyle wise there is little meaningful difference between 350k and 700k when you don’t have much free time to spend it. Sure in theory he would be able to retire sooner etc, but retirement isn’t such a big deal if you don’t hate your job. Also, savings compounds so saving 3x as much doesn’t mean working 1/3 as long especially when you consider social security benefits etc.
- Luc 4y agoI think you misunderstood. The job pressures you into overtime.
- silverstein420 4y ago[flagged]