I re-read the article. I agree I wasn’t capturing the full picture in my initial comment. But I stand by my original sentiment. It would be wonderful to be pro

I re-read the article. I agree I wasn’t capturing the full picture in my initial comment. But I stand by my original sentiment. It would be wonderful to be proven wrong, but I have a feeling that we’re unlikely to see a perfect text generation system with no bias anytime soon. What perfect system exists in the world? You seem to specifically have an issue with the Democrat vs. Republican leaning demonstrated in the article you linked. If the small bias that exists disqualifies your support for this wildly useful tool, then I suppose there’s not much that can change that. We’re left to hope that another model pops up soon whose biases are more favourable to you. Other than the D/R bias, other biases seemed to correlate pretty well with protecting oppressed groups. Once again, under the premise that bias will always exist, I personally think that OpenAI has done a pretty good job at channeling that bias towards protecting groups that tend to be the subject of most hateful content. But then, I’m also coming from a position of being supportive of good moderation. That’s why I like forums like Hacker News, and I suppose why we’re having this conversation at all. If I only saw utility in raw, unbiased, unfiltered text, I’d probably go read elsewhere.