3 ms·
I wonder if they haven't updated that in a while, it sounds low. You can get 22TB 3.5" hard drives these days. If I take that storage and figure full racks with
by ufmace 4y ago
I wonder if they haven't updated that in a while, it sounds low. You can get 22TB 3.5" hard drives these days. If I take that storage and figure full racks with rackmount NASes I get 30 feet long for 1 row of full-size racks. 45 feet is longer and they probably have room for at least 2 rows. Even accounting for probably needing some controller computers and routers and network interfaces and such, I would think they could at least double that these days.
- fbdab103 4y agoSurely for hardware being lugged around on the back of a truck, potentially exposed to whatever heat, humidity, vibration, etc - redundancy becomes a vital component of the design. I would expect at least 2-3x replication for every byte written. Depending on how sealed the container is, they may not want to physically extricate failed drives and merely mark them as unavailable for use.