4 ms·
I find it extremely odd that we discuss the settler-colonial societies in South America as victims of imperialism. They were colonial states setup for the bene
by orange_joe 4y ago
I find it extremely odd that we discuss the settler-colonial societies in South America as victims of imperialism. They were colonial states setup for the benefit of the demographies that continue to rule these societies (mostly). These ex-Spanish colonies weren't very successful compare to the ex-anglo colonies given their emphasis on top-down economic and political structures. I don't accept the notion that the US or other western countries have particular obligation to these nations compared to those colonized and now liberated by the original native populations.
- eschulz 4y agoThis reminds me of something I recently read (can't recall what) where I learned that much of Argentina's pre WWII policy was based on supporting their land owning agricultural class. This only grew during WWII since the world needed their food and raw goods. So yeah, they imported many finished products, and now this is in part a significant cause of their debt since many other corners of the world have significantly increased the economic efficiency of their agricultural industries. But you're right, it was the decisions of many of their ruling class who still are those in power there today. Of course, this is all an over oversimplification of their problems.
- twelve40 4y agoAt least they had more of the native population survive. and in some countries there it's up to almost 50% of the total.
- skissane 4y agoNot Argentina. Less than 3% of Argentina’s population is indigenous. In terms of the fate of its indigenous people, Argentina is quite similar to the US or Australia.