3 ms·
You're confounding the problem of feeding a system with incorrect inputs ( calculator ), with a system that, provided the input are correct, will throw garbage
by bsaul 4y ago
You're confounding the problem of feeding a system with incorrect inputs ( calculator ), with a system that, provided the input are correct, will throw garbage totally at random.
This is a very different kind of system with very different kinds of problems caused to its users.
- worik 4y agoAnd you have missed the point. To be a liar requires creativity This a computer. Creative. This is huge. The most astounding thing is its ability to con you. We will learn to use it. Hydraulics for cognition. Amazing
- wruza 4y agoIt doesn’t lie, it just picks whatever static noise there is after training and converts it into a coherent speech. It is as creative as few TB of /dev/random sprinkled with encrypted facts and decrypted back as a whole.
- gunshai 4y agoI think my caveat of domain knowledge side steps this issue you bring up. It's the entire reason engineering schools teach the "long way" when you're going to rely on the "short way" 99.99% of the time. Also the same could be true for digital calculators when first created. The neural nets (aka humans) that were initially trained to design the system can take short cuts for example on improperly returning or applying functions such as square roots ect. It still confidently gives you the incorrect answer. Given sufficient training data (IE the human) the system improves to return better more accurate results.