3 ms·
Cool progress, really nice work! Not quite high enough fidelity to handle ASL though. Some issues I ran into testing it, if it's something that interests you:
by futhey 4y ago
Cool progress, really nice work!
Not quite high enough fidelity to handle ASL though.
Some issues I ran into testing it, if it's something that interests you:
- Cannot distinguish closed vs. open fingers (always adds gaps between fingers, even if they're touching) (B)
- Can't handle crossed fingers (R)
- Doesn't seem to like extended vs. curled fingers in some cases (H)
- Other failed letters: (Q), (E?), (F?), (G), (Q), (S), (U/V)
But, when signing naturally, it seems to get enough of the shapes and orientation correct enough to understand what I'm seeing. I'm sure there's things it'd trip up on because of some of the above weaknesses in detecting hand shapes but it does seem to get movement, orientation, and position "good enough".