3 ms·
Here you go, a primary source: https://radiationserviceswa.com.au/missing-radioactive-source-in-western-australia/ https://radiationserviceswa.com.au/missing-ra
by dTal 4y ago
Here you go, a primary source: https://radiationserviceswa.com.au/missing-radioactive-source-in-western-australia/ https://radiationserviceswa.com.au/missing-radioactive-sourc...
excerpt>>>
The risk with radiation sources dramatically increases within 1 m – we can calculate the dose rate using the ‘inverse square law’:
At 1 cm, the dose rate will be 10,000 time higher …. 16,650 mSv/h (or 16.65 Sv/h)
At 1mm (ie, if you were to pick the source up with your fingers), the dose rate would be 1,665 Sv/h – this will cause some serious damage to your fingers and surrounding tissues.
>>>
I'm a little suspicious of their inverse-square calculation, though, as by their logic the dose rate would be infinite at a distance of 0m (skin contact). That's clearly not the case.
- gus_massa 4y agoThanks for the link. It looks like the get the official data at 1m and decided to extrapolate, but those calculations don't make any sense. The inverse square law is only a good approximation when the source and the target are small (or other special configurations, for example when one of them is a sphere).