3 ms·
It’s been my experience that economics is a very hard subject to grasp, so what I typically see on forums where someone posts something like this is a lot of di
by gymbeaux 4y ago
It’s been my experience that economics is a very hard subject to grasp, so what I typically see on forums where someone posts something like this is a lot of disagreeing and back and forth (as is the case here).
The issue I think is that… economics is a very hard subject to grasp. Lots of moving parts. I think your comment oversimplifies the point it’s trying to make, but it kind of has to in order to be understood by laymen. Bit of a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation.
I think what you’re saying though is that higher interest rates = more money in companies’ pockets = higher wages paid to workers = the price increase of goods and services being absorbed, and the interest rate increase having a net-zero effect.
I don’t know enough to agree or disagree, I’m just trying to reword what you’re saying.
- bubbleRefuge 4y agosimply stating that increasing federal interest rates will put more money into the private sector from the public sector (deficit spending). This is an income channel which increases aggregate demand which can in of itself increase growth and inflation all things being equal. It is the opposite of the intended policy.