3 ms·
> though it's hard to beat the durability and cost of LTO tape for long-term archival I'm not entirely comfortable with the trend towards ever more esoteric an
by tablespoon 4y ago
> though it's hard to beat the durability and cost of LTO tape for long-term archival
I'm not entirely comfortable with the trend towards ever more esoteric and seemingly "all or nothing" technologies.
Tape (and other physical things) may have their downsides, but I think there's something to be said for something that could (theoretically) be forgotten in a closet and read 50 years later.
Likewise, AM radio may not be the best quality, but it seems like you can cover more area with a single installation than any other communication technology, which might come in handy after a serious disaster like a nuclear war (e.g. crank up the nighttime power of some undamaged countryside station running on generators to tell survivors where it's still safe).
- vbezhenar 4y agoIt's very unlikely that you'll be able to read modern tape from closet in 50 years. Tape requires very precise temperature and humidity for storage. Otherwise all bets are off.
- linksnapzz 4y agoOnly one datapoint; but I’ve seen an FPS/Celerity minicomputer boot off of a Qic-20 tape that’d been stored in a non climate controlled Albuquerque storage unit for 19 years…