5 ms·
> It was the fact that I would not be allowed to share my work internally. I would not even be allowed to brainstorm with people doing the same job in other are
by jensensbutton 4y ago
> It was the fact that I would not be allowed to share my work internally. I would not even be allowed to brainstorm with people doing the same job in other areas of the business.
This is what Apple does as well. So not all FAANGs are equal here.
- jedberg 4y agoMy understanding is that Apple will let you collaborate after what you're working on is public. They just don't want people accidentally sharing unreleased stuff with people who aren't cleared to know about it.
- jensensbutton 4y agoI've been told by folks who work on infra there that they need to file requests to even talk to the previous owners of code if that person has moved to a diff role. So I don't think it's just for unannounced products.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ablatt89 4y agoOnce something is released, there's general access given for that particular software/hw but it still needs to be requested. In a weird way, it creates some internal excitement on "secret" releases but obviously makes development much more difficult.