3 ms·
I saw that too but it doesn't say anything about whether the insurer is still liable. > The majority common law rule among the 50 states is that the owner of a
by barbazoo 4y ago
I saw that too but it doesn't say anything about whether the insurer is still liable.
> The majority common law rule among the 50 states is that the owner of a stolen vehicle will not be held liable for damages when the vehicle is stolen and then involved in an accident that causes injury or property damage.
- brookst 4y agoInsurance is a contract between owner and insurer. The insurer is never directly liable.
- barbazoo 4y agoIf they can't go after the insurer then why would they not insure those cars then instead of just denying the comprehensive coverage due to the missing anti theft device.
- hnburnsy 4y agoThat probably won't stop lawyers who could claim that the owners knew their Kia had weak security and still parked it in an unsafe area with the door left unlocked.