3 ms·
Altavista was better. It would certainly return more than the 5 SEO stained results pages that current search engines are repeating over and over again, pretend
by pessimizer 4y ago
Altavista was better. It would certainly return more than the 5 SEO stained results pages that current search engines are repeating over and over again, pretending that they're bigger than they are.
- egberts1 4y agoToo bad that Yahoo! absorbed Altavista then made that site defunct since 2013.
- acdha 4y agoGoogle was better, too. This is because someone decided it was better to sell ads than give people the most relevant results. It’s not like it’s an unsolved problem in computer science to block persistent spam / scraper / cloaking domains — someone at Google told the people who used to do that to stop.