3 ms·
Yes to all of the above. I like EVs and am kind of a nerd about them, but realistically it doesn't help the adoption of a technology to push it before it's read
by amalgamated_inc 4y ago
Yes to all of the above. I like EVs and am kind of a nerd about them, but realistically it doesn't help the adoption of a technology to push it before it's ready. We just don't have the manufacturing capacity for batteries, they're still quite expensive and finicky (try charging your EV in sub-zero temperatures) and heavy (so no gross capacity limited vehicles like F350 and no sports cars).
It's just like with wind and solar. Why can't we just be honest about what these are good at, use them appropriately, and let the tech develop and improve organically?
- treeman79 4y agoBecause people want power /money and sanity gets in the way. Arguments often boil down to ”vote for me or the world ends” An argument that doesn’t allow for any compromise. Logical or not, honest or not. Sane or not. Science or not. For many it’s all or nothing. So it’s wind and solar and almost nothing else, regardless of consequences. I fully believe if fusion somehow becomes real the green movements will turn against it. Clean cheap and free energy is NOT the goal for them.
- amalgamated_inc 4y agoYea it kind of seems like everything is Pascal's wager now. My argument is correct because any alternative is eternal hellfire. And even if my argument isn't very convincing, we should still do it because 0.1% chance of eternal hellfire is still eternal hellfire.