3 ms·
Isn't that saying the same thing using different words? It is not like the "social predator" is some kind of distinct monster that only has to be slain and then
by randomdata 4y ago
Isn't that saying the same thing using different words? It is not like the "social predator" is some kind of distinct monster that only has to be slain and then all is right with the world. It is fundamentally just people being people and the observation therefore. Even if in some hypothetical way the "social predator" was something that was to be attacked, that would merely make the attacker a "social predator" too, rendering the whole notion an impossibility.
- watwut 4y agoThe difference is in judgement in words. When you say "social predator", the implication is that the person is doing something wrong and are bad in some way.