3 ms·

then pillorying the insurers with bad press >"When the McNaughtons first learned of Opperman’s inaccurate report of the phone call with Loftus, it unnerved the

then pillorying the insurers with bad press >"When the McNaughtons first learned of Opperman’s inaccurate report of the phone call with Loftus, it unnerved them. They started to question if their case would be fairly reviewed." The insurer lied. What is impossible about this situation. The insurer lied to stop spending money. >In a deposition, Kavanaugh said that after she opened the Kumar report and read that he was supporting McNaughton’s current treatment plan, she immediately spoke to her supervisor, who told her to call MRIoA and have the case sent back to Pabby for review. >Kavanaugh said she didn’t save a copy of the Kumar report, nor did she forward it to anyone at United or to officials at Penn State who had been inquiring about the McNaughton case. “I didn’t because it shouldn’t have existed,” she said. “It should have gone back to Dr. Pabby.” They lied and buried evidence against them. They deserve way more than pillorying by the press.

olliej 4y ago
no pillorying in the press only matter if people can choose to go elsewhere. They UHC medical staff should lose their licenses: the nurse because she intentionally lied and covered up medical reports that didn't support her claim, the doctor because they were claiming to do a medical review but were just signing whatever was given to them despite not practicing, not having the relevant speciality, and not actually reading into the patient details. That's clearly malpractice: you're claiming to be a medical professional making a medical decision, that means that's what you do. UHC should be subject to criminal fines and federal oversight. In addition to lawsuit payment. There's malpractice from the above, but that's clearly directed and intentional by the company. The "independent" review board should be required to provide all reports to the patients as well as the insurance companies, the board should not allow the insurance companies any say in who does the review. In all cases a review should be legally required to be from the appropriate field. and they should all be pilloried in the press :D

olliej 4y ago

no pillorying in the press only matter if people can choose to go elsewhere. They UHC medical staff should lose their licenses: the nurse because she intentionally lied and covered up medical reports that didn't support her claim, the doctor because they were claiming to do a medical review but were just signing whatever was given to them despite not practicing, not having the relevant speciality, and not actually reading into the patient details. That's clearly malpractice: you're claiming to be a medical professional making a medical decision, that means that's what you do. UHC should be subject to criminal fines and federal oversight. In addition to lawsuit payment. There's malpractice from the above, but that's clearly directed and intentional by the company. The "independent" review board should be required to provide all reports to the patients as well as the insurance companies, the board should not allow the insurance companies any say in who does the review. In all cases a review should be legally required to be from the appropriate field. and they should all be pilloried in the press :D