4 ms·
Ok. Javascript. It is closer to functional programming than to object oriented. But most developers don't see this and believe that since they can get by shoeh
by jorgeleo 15y ago
Ok.
Javascript. It is closer to functional programming than to object oriented. But most developers don't see this and believe that since they can get by shoehorning "classes" into a prototype then they are back to what is familiar. Prototypes are templates, no classes. Once you develop in javascript with a functional mentality, boy it becomes easy and elegant.
Sql and set theory is another example.
On the more abstracted side... Requirements modeling and calculus. Calculus classes should change the way that you percive