Take some notes of Freedom of Press for the Freedom of Internet. The counterarguments can be simpler than you think; Senator, would you prefer ineffectively b

Take some notes of Freedom of Press for the Freedom of Internet. The counterarguments can be simpler than you think; Senator, would you prefer ineffectively blocking child pornography that paedophiles can work around or allowing children the chance to innovate and communicate freely for their future? Senator, would you prefer ineffectively blocking occasional terrorism that will piss off terrorists or allowing political discussions freely? Senator, would you prefer blocking piracy or allowing anyone to share their content freely? DMCA cracks down on this; a catch-22 that the creator must sell it to claim damages against DMCA notice abusers unless the police charge them with perjury. Not to mention that the notice is scary not only to creator but to other people wishing to re-share. The DMCA does not discriminate against non-commercial sharing. Here's a good history of anti-Internet measures by USA: http://www.rense.com/general85/net.htm http://www.rense.com/general85/net.htm Here's Australia's version: http://libertus.net/moreinfo.html http://libertus.net/moreinfo.html