8 ms·
I'm not seeing what's troubling here. Going strictly off of the examples you provided, I see that they largely hold their donations as bonds, while re-donating
by trimethylpurine 4y ago
I'm not seeing what's troubling here. Going strictly off of the examples you provided, I see that they largely hold their donations as bonds, while re-donating the rest to either purchase open source software or, at the government level, prevent tech companies from selling privacy or participating in censorship. As an anarchist, wouldn't that be something you'd approve of?
I don't use Firefox. I find the UI to be clunky. But after reading your examples I'm persuaded to switch.
- Keegs 4y ago> As an anarchist, wouldn’t that be something you’d approve of? I suspect GP considers themself an anarchist in the pop culture sense, which has little in common with the political practice.