3 ms·
It's interesting that you put the blame for the slowness on Firefox. I blame web developers for failing to build things for browsers rather than just Chrome.
by onion2k 4y ago
It's interesting that you put the blame for the slowness on Firefox. I blame web developers for failing to build things for browsers rather than just Chrome.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rideontime 4y agoThis isn't blaming Firefox any more than one would blame other web browsers for a bad enterprise app requiring Internet Explorer, it's just the sad reality that users have to deal with.
- zeendo 4y agoWhich part of their comment reads as blaming Firefox?
- onion2k 4y agoI love Firefox but some JS heavy demos etc. just don't work fast enough.
- The_Colonel 4y agoHave you read the last sentence as well? > It's because they were only ever tested on Chrome during development.
- onion2k 4y agoThat only means the developers didn't care if it was fast, or even works, in other browsers. It says nothing about Firefox. The first sentence, where the author complains that JS heavy apps are too slow in Firefox, is the part that's about Firefox.
- eCa 4y agoWhat the OG commenter meant (as I read it) was that the page was slow in FF solely because the developer didn’t test the page in FF. It does in no way imply that FF is worse than Chrome, but it does imply that (some) web developers are lazy.
- cassianoleal 4y agoThat sentence is a simple statement of fact - that some apps are too slow in Firefox. It places no blame for the slowness. The blame comes later, and is put on lazy developers.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]