3 ms·
What would we actually consider an AGI? Wikipedia lists the following tests > The Turing Test (Turing): A machine and a human both converse unseen with a secon
by redox99 4y ago
What would we actually consider an AGI? Wikipedia lists the following tests
> The Turing Test (Turing):
A machine and a human both converse unseen with a second human, who must evaluate which of the two is the machine, which passes the test if it can fool the evaluator a significant fraction of the time. Note: Turing does not prescribe what should qualify as intelligence, only that knowing that it is a machine should disqualify it.
> The Coffee Test (Wozniak):
A machine is required to enter an average American home and figure out how to make coffee: find the coffee machine, find the coffee, add water, find a mug, and brew the coffee by pushing the proper buttons.
> The Robot College Student Test (Goertzel):
A machine enrolls in a university, taking and passing the same classes that humans would, and obtaining a degree.
> The Employment Test (Nilsson):
A machine performs an economically important job at least as well as humans in the same job.
LLMs don't seem very far from passing 1), 3) and 4). I wouldn't be surprised if "GPT5" passed those 3.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- sandos 4y agoI think GTP is very far from solving 1), at least if you happen to know anything about LLMs. I think the easiest one of these would be 4) actually.
- redox99 4y agoIs it? I remember reading [1] back in the day, which showed some limitations of GPT3, but ChatGPT actually answers all of those perfectly. [1] https://lacker.io/ai/2020/07/06/giving-gpt-3-a-turing-test.html https://lacker.io/ai/2020/07/06/giving-gpt-3-a-turing-test.h...