8 ms·
> honestly think people largely get what they deserve. >but sure, people still continue to vote in the corrupt and inept leaders. i live in a military state s
by 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
> honestly think people largely get what they deserve.
>but sure, people still continue to vote in the corrupt and inept leaders.
i live in a military state so i don't see much of "democracy". Many years ago, 1986 to be exact, people came out and there was a grassroots level movement for "rights" and people did lots of campaigning and the whole exercise of "elections" but the union government saw that as an attack on their iron grip and the elections were rigged.
Since then, we've had elections in the last 20 odd years but EVERYONE in the elections process is inept and corrupt and a "paid shill". it really doesn't matter who we vote (we don't cast votes for that reason) because it is a bad choice vs bad choice.
No one wants to "stand up" because the whole system locally and the overlords in the union government do NOT allow anyone who would threaten their control and their control means these corrupt people should remain in power.
we've all but given up on this whole thing so yeah. It gets tiring.
>We’ve decided to shun competence and embrace corruption…no surprise we’re seeing the results in a failed economy.
we have only bad options so it is a pointless exercise "choosing between them" so we decide to forgo the whole sham exercise.
well, that is just me so take whatever you can from this
- nisegami 4y agoThe only language the state speaks is violence. Until you meet them where they are, your people cannot effect change.
- MathMonkeyMan 4y agoMaybe this is true. I'm an American and I know Americans who speak this way, but none of them have ever fought against a corrupt domestic foe. And how often do the violent victors reveal their true ambitions? To be exactly those they deposed.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]