4 ms·
Yeah sounded weird to me too, I don’t see why artificial intelligence would get deployed in human size units most of the time. The AWS bill won’t be for 5 Amys,
by dharma1 4y ago
Yeah sounded weird to me too, I don’t see why artificial intelligence would get deployed in human size units most of the time. The AWS bill won’t be for 5 Amys, and I don’t think people will “dial up” to order them
- capableweb 4y ago> I don’t see why artificial intelligence would get deployed in human size units Probably because it would be easier for humans (managers) to make sense of it. If you ask someone how many people would get this particular job done, they could probably guesstimate (and it'll be wrong), but if you ask them how many "AI Compute Units" they need, they'll have a much harder time. That'd be my guess at least.
- ElevenLathe 4y agoWhy would managers need to guess? That seems like a perfect job for another AI: "Hey PM bot, I want to get these tasks done, how many Amy-hours and how many Frank-hours do you estimate it will take?" Also, why not a Manager-bot too? Shareholders can leave humans out of the loop entirely except as necessitated by legal paperwork. Come to think of it, shareholders can probably be replaced too.
- capableweb 4y agoI mean, if we can actually get there, I'd love it, and I'm a programmer. I want to do write code that solves a problem that couldn't be solve in any other way, if it can solved by CodeGPT + ArchitectGPT + ScrumManagerGPT + MiddleManagerGPT without involving me in any way, I'm all for it.
- Tepix 4y agoAs long as AI interacts with humans, having it interact in human size chunks seems like a good idea. In the backend, where AI interacts with AI, perhaps you just want one big blog to get rid of that annoying need for lossy communications.