3 ms·
Agree. It's quite the jump going from a user-centric website to a space launch company that is used by corporations and governments. Like, okay, I guess SpaceX
by Sakos 4y ago
Agree. It's quite the jump going from a user-centric website to a space launch company that is used by corporations and governments. Like, okay, I guess SpaceX is extremely accessible compared to other options in the space industry, but why would that have any bearing on how accessible the Twitter website is for you and me day-to-day?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dzhiurgis 4y agoStarlink has created more information accessibility that twitter will ever will
- mynameisvlad 4y agoBut that’s not in any way shape or form the “accessibility” being talked about here. Just because it’s the same word does not mean it’s the same meaning.
- Sakos 4y agoI wasn't sure how to put it into words and this was exactly what I had in mind.
- dzhiurgis 4y agoYes, but since we are judging a person for his merit…
- mynameisvlad 4y agoDo you understand where you are? This is a comment thread discussing accessibility at Twitter, in a post about Twitter discontinuing part of its platform. It’s not a place to circlejerk Musk’s achievements, regardless how much you would want that to be so. Explain, in exact words, what about SpaceX in any way shape or form would indicate that they know how to handle user a11y and how that would transfer over to Twitter— you know, the thing we’re actually discussing here.