4 ms·
As a guy who likes precision in language, it seems to me that the last option seems perfectly acceptable because resources aren’t always human, correct? Maybe i
by tomcam 4y ago
As a guy who likes precision in language, it seems to me that the last option seems perfectly acceptable because resources aren’t always human, correct? Maybe it means additional officers, hardware, or cloud?
- khazhoux 4y agoNo, "resource" is not used as a catch-all like that. It means people, and I have no idea how it entered the lexicon. It's dehumanizing.
- tomcam 4y agoOK thanks. I’m long out of the corporate world. You’re right, it’s revolting to call people resources.
- Jensson 4y agoThey mean people.
- tomcam 4y agoUgh. I sadly stand corrected.