5 ms·
Using old books to fight Web 3.0
As a skeptical computer scientist I fear we have finally reached the next phase of technology with GPT-3 and stable diffusion, these two technologies in combination with others like deepfake will make for a very different internet, may as well call it what it is, Web 3.0.
For all the positive uses of this new tech the repercussions are 10-fold i.e. misinformation (that has conveniently been 'fact-checked' for us), invasive advertising, lack of privacy and ultimately population control.
Any kind of population control starts with limited / guided access to knowledge, just take a look at North Korea and how its citizens are brainwashed into believing they are living the high life, relative to the rest of the world.
I've always been an avid user of technology, even my major was AI and Data Science in university, but it is time to move on and not allow these technologies into our homes.
Home use can simply be using Google Search, browsing YouTube or Instagram, where everything is going to become even more fake than it is now. There are theories suggesting the internet has been dead for a long time already https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/08/dead-internet-theory-wrong-but-feels-true/619937/.
Outside of keeping connected with people (Signal, Whatsapp, etc), there really is no reason to use the internet except to gain knowledge (isn't that why the internet was invented in the first place? web 1.0). But we all know most people browse the internet to cater for their addictions, be it news, social media or other forms of internet addictions.
Skeptics like myself who don't trust the media and government have an extra difficult time finding authorative & unbiased knowledge, but the solution is simple: go back in time.
I don't mean time travel, I mean books. In particular, books that are pre-2010s, the earlier the better in most subjects.
90% of the knowledge people seek isn't new, even artificial intelligence content like image edge detection was done way back in the 80s. This is not to say new books are useless, but people undermine old books as if they are obsolete, this is only the case in very specific scientific domains.
Now we enter the era where any book, article, news story or even documentary (wont be long now) published after 2023 is either partially or completely generated by algorithms, either spewing propaganda or showing fabricated images and video.
I'd rather read the biased opinion of an author with a ton of life experience, than 'fact-checked' bullshit online, it won't be long before GPT is crowned as the single source of truth because of inevitable 'fact-checking' abilities.
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoYeah, I started building a library in 2020 because of similar thoughts. I tried to buy mostly used books but I’m fairly certain I can look up anything. It still takes some decent change to throw at it but I think it is a write off either way. Additionally it just makes good sense to have multiple ways to look up information and what is printed is harder to change-in-place so there’s at least some level of authenticity or ability to checksum over time or copies.
- lando2 4y agoSmart, i mainly use libgen (legally) and project gutenberg to achieve a similar albeit digital (ereader) result. Bought a 1985 britannica set (200,000+ pages) for a mere $30.
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoYeah I have done some digial book archiving as well. Figured it should be in multiple formats jsut in case and I was and still am especially worried for the case of integrity of words. It feels too easy for a 'memoryhole' event to occur in an 'updated ebook version.' Bitrot, brainrot, and n-rot. You'know? Thanks for sharing!
- potta_coffee 4y agoWe have a library of now thousands of books, history, science, any many other topics. The internet I remember as a kid had lots of information but today's internet indeed seems fruitless when I search for anything.
- lando2 4y agoVery nice. Shame for the current generation who never got to experience the internet when its purpose was much simpler
- arkitaip 4y ago> Outside of keeping connected with people (Signal, Whatsapp, etc), there really is no reason to use the internet except to gain knowledge (isn't that why the internet was invented in the first place? web 1.0). Except online banking, using mandatory national digital id services, paying for stuff, applying for a job and you know a million other thinga that are completely digital. > I don't mean time travel, I mean books. In particular, books that are pre-2010s, the earlier the better in most subjects. Ok now I'm pretty sure this entire rant is generated by an AI using a weird prompt because there is no way that ChatGPT would output such a poorly constructed argumentet.