3 ms·
I read a good take on this. Ethically, it's probably a good thing to compensate the rights holders. But it also means the only companies that can afford this
by nickfromseattle 4y ago
I read a good take on this.
Ethically, it's probably a good thing to compensate the rights holders.
But it also means the only companies that can afford this licensing are going to be the existing incumbents, e.g. Facebook, Amazon, Google, Microsoft.
And that society is probably worse if these companies gate keep society's access to good AI and the vasty majority of the productivity gains AI brings.
- ausudhz 4y agoThat's a good take, but the point I think is on revenue sharing. You can use data, just reward the data owners a fair percentage based on the incoming revenue of the Company (big or small)